Thursday, April 8, 2010

Ag Bulk-Handling Facility at Grays Harbor to Expand

Omaha, Neb.-based Ag Processing Inc. has announced plans for a multi-million dollar expansion to its agriculture bulk-commodity facility at the Port of Grays Harbor in Aberdeen, Wash.

The agricultural co-op's plans call for the construction of storage silos and rail-unloading facilities on an 13.5 acre parcel next to its current Grays Harbor Terminal 2 facility.

The firm optioned the property from the port in January 2009 and has spent more than a year conducting market analysis and preliminary design work. Construction is expected to begin this fall. When completed in early 2012, the additional facilities will be integrated into AGP's existing 75-acre facility.

“This investment will allow AGP to provide grain, feed ingredients, and oilseeds along with our current range of processed products to our customers in Pacific Rim countries,” said AGP Chief Executive Officer Marty Reagan. “It will also provide our customers with a secure supply of grain and oilseeds directly from AGPs farm-to-port cooperative supply chain that they value.”

AGP, the largest farmer-owned soybean processor in the world, is owned by Midwest cooperatives representing over 200,000 farmers in more than 16 states.

“AGP has been a vital partner in the growth of shipping activity in Grays Harbor and we are thrilled they are increasing their presence on Washington’s Coast,” said Grays Harbor Port Commission President Jack Thompson. “This project will more than double our vessel calls, creating jobs for our longshore workers, rail operators, tug assists and pilots. It is great news for our community.”

Port officials said in a statement that they "estimate shipping volumes will more than double due to the expansion, reaching new Pacific Rim markets with commodities shipped through Grays Harbor."

Commodities will arrive via unit trains transported by Burlington Northern Santa Fe and RailAmerica’s Puget Sound and Pacific Railroad direct to the Port of Grays Harbor marine terminal complex. Port officials are working with the railroads, as well as federal, state and local agencies to expand rail capacity in the region.

Evergreen Boosts US West Coast Service

Ocean carrier Evergreen Line plans to reintroduce a 20-port pendulum service that will expand coverage of the United States West Coast. The service will cover a range from Tacoma, Washington, to Valencia, Spain via Asia and the Middle East.

The new US West Coast - Asia -Mediterranean, or UAM, service begins May 10 and replaces the existing Asia-Pacific-North West Coast, or PNM, and Far-East Mediterranean, or FEM, services. These two routes were introduced in October 2009 as temporary services.

The UAM service will utilize 14 vessels, each capable of carrying 5,400 TEU vessels. The service will launch mid-rotation on May 10 in Kaohsiung with the first vessel leaving Tacoma on May 23.

The westbound rotation for the service will be: Tacoma > Vancouver > Tokyo > Osaka > Qingdao > Shanghai > Ningbo > Kaohsiung > Hong Kong > Yantian > Tanjung Pelepas > Colombo > Ashdod > Alexandria > Taranto > Genoa > Barcelona > Valencia.

The eastbound rotation for the service will be: Valencia > Taranto > Colombo > Tanjung Pelepas > Kaohsiung > Hong Kong > Yantian > Shanghai > Ningbo > Tacoma.

Washington Senator Talks National Freight Strategy, Port Funding

During a visit to the Washington State Port of Vancouver on Tuesday, Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA) said that in order to meet President Barack Obama's call to double United States exports within five years, multimodal freight transportation must become a national priority. To this end, she announced plans to push fellow federal lawmakers for the creation of a national freight strategy that includes significant funding for port infrastructure projects.

One project specifically mentioned by Cantwell was the Vancouver port's $140 million West Vancouver Freight Access project, which the port currently requires $50 million to $70 million to complete. Port officials said that if Cantwell succeeds in her national freight strategy plan, they will immediately request $25 million for the freight project.

The port had hoped to tap into President Obama's American Recovery and Reinvestment Act stimulus funding to move the project forward, but ultimately garnered $2.5 million for the project from the nearly $800 billion allocated nationwide.

Cantwell said she had not yet determined how much infrastructure money she would ask to be made available through such a national freight strategy plan.

Particle Pollution Down at Los Angeles Port for 3rd Year Running

Particulate air pollution generated by the Port of Los Angeles dropped for a third straight year in 2009, according to data released by the port Tuesday.

Sampling collected by four monitoring stations in the port area measured marked reductions in elemental carbon during 2009. Measurements of elemental carbon are used to estimate diesel particulate matter levels, a tiny particulate pollution that is most often seen as soot coming from exhaust pipes. DPM also contains known carcinogens and is considered by the state of California to be a toxic air contaminant. 

Elemental carbon was down 34 percent in the port-neighboring community of San Pedro and down 45 percent in the port-neighboring community of Wilmington, when 2009 levels at both locations were compared to 2006 levels. Measurements taken in the middle of the port during 2009 indicate that elemental carbon generation has dropped by 48 percent compared to 2006 levels. Numbers comparing 2009 measurements to last year were not readily available.

Measurements of PM2.5, an ultra-fine particulate air pollutant, also fell below federal and state maximum levels in 2008 and 2009--the first time since the port began monitoring air pollution in 2005.

”This dramatic decline in the amount of DPM and the fact that we have attained air quality standards for PM2.5 show that the measures we adopted in the Clean Air Action Plan are really working to reduce harmful air pollutants in neighboring communities,” said Christopher Patton, the Environmental Affairs Officer who heads the Port’s air quality staff.

Patton pointed to the port's Clean Truck Program as a main reason for the reduction of DPM. He also cited the state’s restrictions on the sulfur content of fuel used in vessels and equipment operated at the port, the Port’s Alternative Maritime Power program, and the San Pedro Bay Vessel Speed Reduction program as key measures the state and the port have used to tackle vessel emissions. The Port has also spent millions of dollars retrofitting cargo-handling equipment and harbor craft engines with pollution control devices, and pioneering the use of alternative fuels and power systems.

The reductions are also a clear-cut example of how industry and government have worked together to achieve air quality goals.

In each of the cited reasons, excluding the yard equipment retrofits, the shipping and transportation industries have paid the upfront costs for new cleaner equipment. The shipping industry also continued using low-sulfur fuel throughout 2009 despite a court ruling that held up the state regulation mandating its use for several months. The shipping industry also stepped up to the plate and voluntarily signed on to the Vessel Speed Reduction program and the Alternative Marine Power program.

Despite the monitoring stations recording a wide range of pollutants, such as oxides of sulfur, oxides of nitrogen and greenhouse gases, the port has yet to release a summary of the 2009 findings for these pollutants.

Seattle Marine Business Coalition to hold Economic Forecast Breakfast

The Seattle Marine Business Coalition will hold its General Memberships meeting on April 21 with a panel discussion on the city, state and regional current economic climate. This meeting will be open to members and non-members. A panel of local and state legislators and policmakers will share their views on the current state of our local economy and listen to comments about how private and public sectors can work together to ensure the region's economic health.

Economic Forecast Breakfast
April 21, 2010 | 7:30am - 9:30am
Ivar's Salmon House 
$15 - SMBC members
$21 - non-members

Panelists will include:
  • Daniel Malarkey, Deputy Director, Washington State Department of Commerce
  • Reuven Carlyle, Washington State Representative, 36th District
  • Gael Tarleton, Commissioner, Port of Seattle
  • Sally Bagshaw, Council Member, City of Seattle
Expected to attend are decision makers from the private sector, and policymakers from the public sector: maritime industrial, commercial fishing and manufacturing sector representatives, downtown business interests, and local and regional policymakers and legislators. The following will be invited, and in turn encouraged to invite their membership.
  • Seattle Chamber of Commerce, Phil Bussey
  • Manufacturing Industrial Center, Dave Gering
  • BINMIC AC, John Kane (includes NSIA, Ballard Chamber of Commerce and SMBC)
  • Downtown Seattle Association, Kate Joncas
  • SODO, Mike Peringer
  • Seattle Department of Economic Development, Steve Johnson
  • Washington State Department of Commerce, Maury Forman
To register for this event email Marilyn@RHPPublishing.com. For more information contact Peter Philiips at peter@RHPPublishing.com.

The Seattle Marine Business Coalition is a 501c (3) nonprofit that represents the interests of Seattle’s marine industrial land users. Our 300 member companies are clustered at the north and south ends of the viaduct in Seattle’s tow industrially zoned neighborhoods: the Ballard Interbay North End Manufacturing Center (BINMIC) and the Duwamish Industrial Neighborhood.

SMBC membership consists of companies involved in commercial fishing and marine transportation: fishing vessel operators, tug and barge operators, operators of tour boats and ferries and general cargo vessel operators. Member companies also include shipyards, fuel providers, marine construction companies and vendors and suppliers to the commercial maritime and commercial fishing companies.


Seattle Marine Business Coalition to hold Economic Forecast Breakfast

The Seattle Marine Business Coalition will hold its General Membership meeting on April 21 with a panel discussion on the city, state and regional current economic climate. This meeting will be open to members and non-members. A panel of local and state legislators and policymakers will share their views on the current state of our local economy and listen to
comments about how private and public sectors can work together to ensure the region's economic health.

Economic Forecast Breakfast
April 21, 2010 | 7:30am - 9:30am
Ivar's Salmon House, Seattle
$15 - SMBC members
$21 - non-members

Panelists will include:
  • Daniel Malarkey, Deputy Director, Washington State Department of Commerce
  • Reuven Carlyle, Washington State Representative, 36th District
  • Gael Tarleton, Commissioner, Port of Seattle
  • Sally Bagshaw, Council Member, City of Seattle
Expected to attend are decision makers from the private sector, and
policymakers from the public sector: maritime industrial, commercial fishing
and manufacturing sector representatives, downtown business interests, and
local and regional policymakers and legislators. The following will be
invited, and in turn encouraged to invite their membership.
  • Seattle Chamber of Commerce, Phil Bussey
  • Manufacturing Industrial Center, Dave Gering
  • BINMIC AC, John Kane (includes NSIA, Ballard Chamber of Commerce and SMBC)
  • Downtown Seattle Association, Kate Joncas
  • SODO, Mike Peringer
  • Seattle Department of Economic Development, Steve Johnson
  • Washington State Department of Commerce, Maury Forman
To register for this event email Marilyn@RHPPublishing.com. For more information contact Peter Philips at peter@RHPPublishing.com.

The Seattle Marine Business Coalition is a 501c (3) nonprofit that represents the interests of Seattle’s marine industrial land users. Our 300 member companies are clustered at the north and south ends of the viaduct in Seattle’s two industrially zoned neighborhoods: the Ballard Interbay North End Manufacturing Center (BINMIC) and the Duwamish Industrial Neighborhood.

SMBC membership consists of companies involved in commercial fishing and marine transportation: fishing vessel operators, tug and barge operators, operators of tour boats and ferries and general cargo vessel operators. Member companies also include shipyards, fuel providers, marine construction companies and vendors and suppliers to the commercial maritime and commercial fishing companies.

Green Terminal Development

All along the West Coast, ports are in a race to upgrade their facilities to attract and hold tenants. At the same time, the pressure to do so in an environmentally responsible manner has never been greater. The ports and the contractors they employ have risen to the challenge, and have completed projects that meet the needs of the environmental community, the state and federal regulators and, more importantly, the clients.

Oakland Materials Management

At the Port of Oakland, the maintenance, repair, and construction of maritime terminals, wharves, roads, and structures generates substantial quantities of asphalt, concrete and soil, while new construction projects frequently require large quantities of aggregate base, drain rock, and clean fill. The Port of Oakland staff designed a Materials Management Program, under which the Port handles and stores concrete, asphalt, and soil generated by construction projects at a centralized location within the Port’s footprint. The Port has retained a contractor to crush the stockpiled asphalt and concrete to project and regulatory specifications to create drain rock and aggregate base. The Port then provides the drain rock and aggregate base to the project engineers and contractors, for use in constructing new facilities. For crushing activities in the maritime area, the Port issued a RFP and retained Evans Brothers, Inc. (EBI) as the successful bidder. The Port has operated its Materials Management Program at the seaport since 2007, and estimates that it has diverted 119,198 cubic yards of material from area landfills and saved Port projects an estimated $2,974,000 in disposal costs. During the same period (January 2007-November 2009), the Port estimates that it has reused 32,000 tons of crushed material, for a total estimated savings of $150,000. Total savings: $3,124,000.

The Port of Oakland has also developed the Industrial Group Monitoring Program (IGMP) to help marine terminal operators comply with complex storm water permit requirements. Under the IGMP, the Port assists its tenants by providing storm water sampling analysis and testing, facility inspections, compliance and reporting assistance, and training. Tenants benefit from participation in the IGMP by saving significant consultant and monitoring costs, improved compliance with stormwater permit requirements, and reduced exposure to enforcement action. Over the years, the Port has documented improved implementation of best management practices and improved water quality at participating facilities. The Port considers the IGMP a “win-win” for the Port and its tenants by simplifying and improving compliance, reducing environmental harm and reducing environmental liability.

Long Beach Waste Material Recycling

The Long Beach project is expected to recycle 16,300 tons of asphalt, 6,600 tons of base and 60,000 tons of concrete, as well as 5,000 tons of steel. Photo courtesy of the Port of Long Beach.

As the Port of Long Beach plans $3 billion in improvements to its terminals, roads, bridges and railways over the next decade, the Port is including technology and systems that will help clean the air even as container trade increases.

Leading the way will be a new era in emissions reduction from construction equipment with the Port’s upcoming Middle Harbor terminal redevelopment project, where everything from bulldozers to construction tugboats will be required to take steps to reduce diesel exhaust and other emissions with newer engines, cleaner fuels and particulate traps.

Some of the Port’s environmental policies have already been implemented, including shore power and on-dock rail, as well as the aggressive recycling requirements for demolition materials at the Port.

Reclaimed Resources

The Port’s strict recycling guidelines seek out ways to reuse the tons of concrete, asphalt, base aggregate and demolished building materials as a means of saving landfill space, and truck trips, in a region where landfill space is at a premium and air quality is a serious concern.

In the development of new terminal facilities at the port, work crews from contractor Connolly Pacific Co. are demolishing a wharf structure that surrounds a slip slated to be filled in. While the fill-in will one day create a more efficient terminal layout for operator ITS, the port is able to reuse all the demolition material, including concrete deck and pilings that have been sunk in the water for decades.

The project is expected to recycle 16,300 tons of asphalt, 6,600 tons of base and 60,000 tons of concrete, as well as 5,000 tons of steel.

The work is being completed with State air emissions-compliant equipment, including harbor craft and off-road equipment, and has provided the full time engagement of approximately 50 people for 6 months, not including various vendors.

Other materials like excavated asphalt and non-contaminated soil are reused as a matter of course all across the Port, which includes requirements for such recycling in its agreements with contractors. Reused soil alone can amount to up to tens of thousands of cubic yards a year.

The Port is using a new system to reuse the waste base gravel or aggregate underneath the pavement. By grinding up the material and mixing it with cement, the Port can reuse the material, saving money and avoiding trucking out the waste and trucking in new supplies.

Preliminary site preparation for the Port’s new administration and maintenance complex included the razing of a truck depot structure and the recycling of the tons and tons of pavement and base. When it’s complete, the preparation will have recycled 95 percent of the demolition materials, and assisted in the Port’s efforts to gain a “platinum level” Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) rating for the building.

New Materials

Under the Port of Long Beach’s Green Building procedures, contractors are required to obtain a substantial amount of the construction materials from local sources.

The Port prefers to transfer reusable soil and fill from one project to another that may need it, but when there’s not an imminent project, the Port is working on setting aside vacant land at the Port to store material for another time. The Port would have to forgo potential income on the site, but would save landfill spaces and truck trips.

Currently, Manson Construction Co. is acting as the contractor in a joint project between the Port and the US Army Corps of Engineers to dredge parts of the Long Beach Harbor. Not only is the dredge material being reused right in the Port as slip fill material, Manson is using an electric-powered dredger, rather than diesel. The Port has mandated that all capital dredging will use electrical power, thus reducing substantial amounts of emissions for large projects.

In early 2009, the Port dedicated its new Port of Long Beach Security Command and Control Center, a three-story, 25,000-square-foot facility that qualified for silver LEED certification. As part of earning that certification, contractor FTR International was required to recycle more than 75 percent of the demolition and construction waste materials at the site. It exceeded this requirement by recycling more than 90 percent of all construction waste materials.

For its upcoming Middle Harbor terminal redevelopment project, the Port of Long Beach has created a “sediment management plan,” a comprehensive plan to maximize the reuse of dredged sediments as slip fill to avoid dumping it in landfills or the ocean, or having to dig somewhere else – a “fresh dig” – just for fill. The project will also accept dredged material from other dredging projects in the region, unrelated to the Port, to provide a useful way to reuse that material.

LA’s Green Wheels

Across the harbor, the Port of Los Angeles is concentrating its efforts on wheeled equipment. The Port’s Clean Truck Program is a central element of its Clean Air Action Plan, which targets major sources of air emissions at the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach – ships, trains, trucks, cargo handling equipment and harbor craft. In its first year, the Port estimates the program reduced the rate of port truck emissions by 70 percent. When fully implemented in 2012, the port expects truck emissions to be reduced by more than 80 percent.

One way the port hopes to reduce emissions is with an all-electric drayage truck, built as a demonstration project co-funded by the Port of Los Angeles and South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). Intended specifically for short-haul or “drayage” operations, the electric tractor, designed and produced exclusively for the Port by Balqon Corporation, is the result of nearly a year of development and testing. The heavy-duty electric short-haul drayage truck can pull a 60,000-pound cargo container at a top speed of 40 mph, and has a range of 30 to 60 miles per battery charge. Up to four electric trucks can be charged simultaneously by one charger in four hours, or as much as 60 percent of the charge in one hour to meet peak demands during daily operations.
Seattle’s Green Goal
When Seattle Port Executive Director Tay Yoshitani took the reins three years ago, he announced his commitment to make Seattle “the cleanest, greenest, and most energy-efficient Port in America.” 

When Yoshitani took over, the Port had already switched to alternative fuels in seaport equipment, and two cruise ship berths had been fitted with shore power. Further steps toward Yoshitani’s goal include green product purchasing, sustainable building practices, reduced energy consumption, recycling, air quality improvement and noise reduction measures. 

In addition to the port’s shore power at two cruise ship berths, an at-berth clean fuels program, in partnership with Puget Sound Clean Air Agency, provides up to $2,250 per vessel call for participating ships that burn 0.5% or less sulfur content fuel while at berth in Seattle. Nearly 200 pieces of cargo handling equipment at the port have been retrofitted with emissions reduction devices or are running on low sulfur fuel or biodiesel.

The Port’s ScRAPS (Scrappage and Retrofits for Air in Puget Sound) clean truck program has removed 100 pre-1994 trucks from the Port’s drayage fleet. Owners who scrap trucks through the program can receive up to $5,000 for their pre-1994 trucks. More than half of the scrapped trucks have been replaced with newer, cleaner models.
Seattle’s ongoing piling maintenance and replacement program replaces old, creosote soaked wooden piles with more environmentally friendly concrete or steel piles, as well as corrosion resistant plastic piles, made of recycled material and impervious to marine borers, which the Port recently installed at its Maritime Industrial Center facility.

Perhaps one of the biggest sustainability factors affecting the Port of Seattle and other Pacific Northwest ports is the “fish window” from mid-August to mid-February. During this time, no in-water construction work can take place although he dates vary a bit from location to location. 

Most Pacific Northwest ports are operating in areas with active native commercial and subsistence fisheries, which, by law, must be accommodated. In an ongoing effort to sustain the fisheries, the Port of Seattle has launched an interesting innovation at Terminal 115, which is home to barges that move between Puget Sound and 200 large and small ports throughout Alaska. One of the Port’s engineers has designed a structural element on the Terminal 115 subtidal sheet pile wall that protects tribal fishing nets from damage as they blouse over the top of the wall. 

Regionally, the Ports of Seattle and Tacoma continue to work with Vancouver, BC on the Northwest Ports Clean Air Strategy, a partnership to reduce diesel particulate matter and greenhouse gas emissions in the Puget Sound region. Proposed performance standards would reduce particulate matter by 70% from ocean-going vessels at berth, 30% from cargo-handling equipment, and emission reductions from heavy duty trucks.

Portland’s Environmental Management
While the Port of Portland, Oregon, has been practicing environmental stewardship for years, recent developments have stepped up the port’s participation in mitigation and conservation programs.
Some of the Port’s environmental programs include the conservation and protection of water resources in order to minimize the impact of commercial shipping to regional waterways, and the enhancement and protection of natural resources to safeguard native habitats and species.

Efforts include waste management and recycling programs, as well as air quality standards to reduce emissions from Port-controlled sources with an emphasis on particulate matter and greenhouse gases. Energy management efforts center around increasing fuel efficiency of port sources, as well as the reduction of energy usage, and the use of renewable sources of energy.

Air Quality

In 2009, the Port of Portland completed a Port-wide greenhouse gas emissions inventory in accordance with the Climate Registry protocol. Some of the Port’s fleet has been replaced by alternative fuel and hybrid vehicles, and all container-handling equipment at the Port’s Marine Terminal 6 uses ultra low sulfur diesel. The Port has worked with operators and labor at Terminal 6 to institute an idling reduction program for cargo handling equipment during lunches and scheduled breaks. Port staff has also educated truckers using Port facilities about resources available to them from Cascade Sierra Solutions, a not-for-profit organization that helps upgrade older freight-moving vehicles with new, more fuel-efficient engines.

Some older yard equipment has been replaced or retrofitted with diesel oxidation catalysts to help reduce diesel particular emissions. At the same time, the Port has invested in cleaner-burning cargo-handling equipment (7 new reach stackers) to reduce diesel particulate matter; this same equipment uses low-ash, lower emission oil.

On the waterside, the dredge Oregon and her support vessels use low sulfur diesel, as do all the switcher locomotives at Portland’s marine terminals. At Terminals 2, 4 and 6, shore side power applications allow cold ironing for select vessels while docked to reduce fuel consumption emissions.

Power Use and Recycling

The Port of Portland, which is recognized by the Environmental Protection Agency as a major purchaser of renewable energies, has completed extensive emissions inventories for its marine facilities, and is using the data to determine where further reductions can be achieved. An initial decision to purchase 10 percent of the Port’s electricity needs in the form of renewable energy has now grown to a commitment in the Port’s strategic plan to purchase 100 percent renewable energy.

Ninety percent of all the Port’s construction waste is recycled, and Portland’s marine facilities have received “Conditionally Exempt Generator” status by the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality by demonstrating responsible materials procurement, handling, and waste management practices, including the removal and recycling of obsolete grain silos at the Port’s Terminal 4 redevelopment.
Like Seattle, Portland is replacing creosote-treated wood with environmentally friendly materials, including the replacement of 33 percent of treated timber chocks with recycled plastic chocks at Terminal 6. The Port also installed 35 acres of porous asphalt at the T6 auto facility to handle heavy rain. Between the asphalt and adjacent bioswales, 100 percent of stormwater runoff from this portion of the terminal is now managed onsite. In addition to educating Port employees and tenants about the connection between stormwater and river health, a phased catch basin retrofit program has been recently implemented at the marine terminals, and runoff contaminants have been reduced or eliminated, using best practices as well as swales and natural vegetation. The Port offers a mercury awareness training program and mercury disposal areas at the marine facilities, and at Terminal 2 the Port has completed a stormwater system clean-out project. A simple but powerful step has been for the port to increase the frequency of sweeping at our terminals to help protect stormwater.
The Port has developed partnerships with various groups on species protection, including western painted turtles and streaked horned larks, and maintains a vigilant program for invasive species control both on land and in the water, with invasive species monitoring stations in place at Terminals 4, 5, and 6.

Port of Tacoma Demolition Achievements

Like other ports on the West Coast, the Port of Tacoma has made significant progress in reducing impact on the environment through programs that not only encourage, but require, Port staff and contractors to reduce waste.

When the Port demolished almost 60 structures during the past two years to make way for planned development on the Tacoma Tideflats, its contractors diverted from landfills an average 87 percent of the waste. 

In addition to minimum requirements, pro-rated cash incentives were offered for those contractors that achieved diversion rates higher than 65 percent, and contractors were required to use ultra-low sulfur diesel (USLD) in their equipment to the greatest extent possible. 

From June 2008 through December 2009, the Port and its tenants removed 57 structures from the Tacoma Tideflats area. Many of the structures were old and abandoned, posing both environmental and human hazard. These structures varied from a single-story wood-framed residence to multiple-story concrete, masonry and steel-framed industrial buildings.

Demolition resulted in the Port and its contractors diverting 7,071 tons of material from landfills—enough to fill about 275 dump trucks. Diversion efforts also generated 19,671 tons of recycled masonry, concrete and asphalt for reuse on other Port projects. 

By weight, the contractors on these projects were able to divert an average 87 percent of all non-hazardous waste from landfills. Reusing the on-site recycled material eliminated the need to mine new native material and significantly reduced truck-related emissions that would have resulted from importing new material to the Port.

Material Reuse

In addition, more than 1,500 creosote-soaked wood pilings were removed from Commencement Bay waterways. The Port’s diversion requirement prompted Port contractor Northwest Demolition to seek other ways to dispose of these items. By selling the piling to farmers and growers in Eastern Washington, a significant portion were salvaged for reuse in pole barns and storage facilities. 

Through this program, several World War II-era pier structures and supporting mooring dolphins also were removed, eliminating more than 85,000 square feet of overwater coverage and clearing debris from about half a mile of shoreline. 

The contract requirements and cash incentives pushed contractors to look for alternate, creative means of disposal or reuse in lieu of simply transporting waste to landfills. Two of the contractors, DEMCO and R.W. Rhine, went well beyond the Port’s requirements to reach diversion rates of 99.24 percent and 98.52 percent, respectively.
On one demolition site, DEMCO worked out a creative, mutually beneficial deal with Recovery One, a company that converts and separates construction debris into salvageable material. DEMCO wanted Recovery One to transport and recycle materials from the site. Recovery One offered discounts in exchange for tanks and equipment from the demolition site that it wanted for a stormwater treatment system. This collaborative effort reduced costs, kept material from the landfill and helped protect water quality on another Tideflats site.
The Port and R.W. Rhine worked together to find a business that could reuse a specialized treatment system found on one demolition site. The treatment system, which uses chemicals to remove oil and other materials from water, was dismantled and taken to Petroleum Reclaiming Services, where it will be reinstalled to process waste oils.
To assist the Port in this demolition program, the Port contracted with ReUse Consulting to analyze each site and provide a report identifying items for reuse or recycling. This information provided valuable ideas for contractors on alternate means of disposal, including potential contacts and sources.
The Port also found the information useful in determining what items potentially could be sold as surplus before demolition began. As a result, two buildings were sold and dismantled for reuse elsewhere, tanks and equipment were salvaged for reuse by a Port tenant to expand within compliance requirements and usable equipment was sold rather than scrapped. 

In addition to the 57 structures removed, the Port of Tacoma also sold four retired straddle carriers at auction, with the stipulation that as many of the pieces as possible should be reused or recycled. The buyer, Goshen Forest Products, dismantled the cargo-handling equipment and followed through. Contractors will reuse the long steel columns as rollers for moving structures and heavy pieces of equipment, and Wingfoot Commercial Tires purchased the wheels and rims for reuse. The engine oil was recycled as well, and most of the remaining pieces were salvaged by Schnitzer Steel for reuse or recycling.


Tuesday, April 6, 2010

Maersk to Add ‘One-Time’ Charge for Damaged Containers

You break it, you buy it. Or, at least, under a new Maersk Line container damage policy, you will pay a bit more to fix it.

Starting May 1, Maersk Line will begin charging an ‘out-of-service’ fee of $150 per dry container and $350 per reefer to cover additional costs associated with the repair of damaged containers.

Maersk had been absorbing these additional costs, which include lifting, transporting, repairing and various administration costs related to repairing a damaged container. 

Beginning in May, parties responsible for damaging containers will be billed for the ‘out-of-service’ costs, as well as for the actual costs or repairing the container. 

"We sincerely believe the ‘out-of-service’ charge is the fairest way to cover the costs of damaged containers -- as it means that only parties who are responsible for damage will have to shoulder the costs," said a spokesman for the shipping line.

‘Out-of-service’ charges were calculated to be as close as possible to the actual costs incurred by the company, said Maersk. Terms and timing of the new policy may differ slightly from country to country based on regional pricing schedules already in place. 

The new policy is expected to improve overall service, the shipping line said, by increasing equipment availability and reliability.

CEO: Maersk May Sell some Units, Buy other Firms in 2010

After suffering its first annual loss since World War II, Transportation giant A.P. Moeller-Maersk, may be looking toward selling off some less profitable business units while acquiring others during 2010, according to Chief Executive Nils Smedegaard Andersen, quoted in Monday’s Maersk Post, the company’s company newsletter.

Andersen made it clear that the Danish firm, parent to the world's largest container carrier Maersk Line, has moved well away from "survival mode" and is now looking at becoming more competitive. "I hope we will be able to make an interesting acquisition or buy some distressed assets," Andersen said through the newsletter. Anderson favors acquisitions for the firm's oil and gas exploration division and its port operations unit. 

However, the firm is still planning to cut another $500 million in costs this year, bringing total announced spending reductions by the firm since last year to $2.5 billion. The firm reported a $1.29 billion net loss in 2009, the first in more than 60 years for the 105-year-old conglomerate. Andersen said the firm may sell off some of its less profitable assets as part of the overall cost cutting plan. 

Despite the cost cutting, Andersen said he believes that A.P. Moeller-Maersk is poised to have a "reasonable result" by year's end due to the firm's ability to turn a "far better profit" in 2010 than its competitors.

Andersen said that following the already extensive cost-cutting measures already taken, the firm will have to look at "fruits that hang higher" and for "smaller items and areas" to achieve the needed cuts this year.

Guam Port Gets DOD Funds to Begin Modernization Work

The United States Department of Defense has agreed to pay $50 million to complete upgrades at the Port Authority of Guam (PAG), according to Guam Congressional Delegate Madeleine Bordallo.

Speaking to a Rotary Club group on Monday, Bordallo said that the PAG has identified just under $160 million in infrastructure projects needed to meet the requirements of an impending U.S. military buildup on the island.

The port is undergoing a rapid expansion as it prepares for the U.S. government’s transfer of all military operations and personnel from Okinawa, Japan to Guam later this year. In May, 2008, Guam’s Governor Felix Camacho signed-off on an estimated $195 million 2007 Master Plan aimed at modernizing the PAG to accommodate the expanded military presence. An estimated 8,000 U.S. Marines and 9,000 dependents from Okinawa is expected to increase traffic through the Guam port by more than 100 percent, an increase that many fear the current infrastructure at the port will not be able to handle without serious modernization efforts.

Bordallo said that the PAG applied for $100 million in grants and loan programs through the U.S. Department of Transportation including a request for $50 million in national recovery grant funds, but the DOT denied request. Without the start-up funds, the PAG can not qualify for a $49 million low-interest loan from the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Following the rejection of funding, Bordallo and Guam Gov. Felix Camacho took up the case directly with the Department of Defense. Bordallo said once she gave an impassioned explanation of what caused the failed grant applications, DOD officials said they would pay the $50 million in start-up funds. The money is expected to be available in the next several weeks. In addition, the DOD agreed with Bordallo's request that she be named "buildup czar," taking on a role as head of the buildup program on Guam.

Woodland Port Hires New Executive Director

The governing board for the inland Columbia River Port of Woodland has announced that Nelson Holmberg will take the helm as the port's new executive director effective April 12.

The 43-year-old Holmberg, who has served as the communications manager for the Washington state Port of Vancouver for the past three years, will replace outgoing executive director Erica Rainford who announced in February that she is leaving the port after two years in the top executive slot.

In his new position, Holmberg will take a small cut in pay, earning $61,000 compared to his $64,170 salary at Vancouver. Holmberg will also become one of only two full-time employees on the Port of Woodland staff, compared to a total of 80 staff at Vancouver and more than 400 employees at each of the nation's two leading ports in Long Beach and Los Angeles. 

Located about 85 miles inland from the Pacific Ocean, the Washington state Port of Woodland has about 200 acres of industrial property serviced by Interstate Highway 5, BNSF and Union Pacific main lines, and a federally maintained deep-draft water channel that is 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide.